Friday
Feb192010
Freeze frame
Fri, February 19, 2010 at 12:20
I must confess that when Mark asked me at short-ish notice if I'd volunteer at the photography workshop he was organising, I didn't expect it to happen. Mark thought he was coming down with something; I wasn't feeling too great and I trusted something would 'crop up' forcing one or both of us to cancel. I'm someone who normally has to be dragged kicking and screaming in front of a camera, and the uncertainty lowered the barrier enough for me to say yes. We'd discussed him taking my photograph a number of times and I'd always chickened out. This time, the prospect of going out to eat afterwards with Mark, his wife Jo and the other participants appealed as a motivation to get out a bit and break the seasonal lethargy.
Being relaxed in front of a camera is, like playing the upper register on the clarinet, a skill I've never mastered. I've always found it mildly inconveniencing but not really annoying. I looked at this as a challenge. I was inquisitive and nervous. Being shot in black and white also appealed to me. The instructions were straightforward too: a dark top and a coat with a fur collar if possible. (Had Mark said: "A pale blue top would be nice, and a sunny disposition. Oh, and please do wear something frilly and feminine and pink," I'd have been up sh*t creek.) There were also some additional instructions for the Man, who was pencilled in to appear out of focus as an extra. This didn't happen, much to the Man's relief.
The workshop took place outside, on a college campus. It was a couple of degrees below zero with a vicious windchill but luckily the gymnasium was open and heated and provided a welcome refuge between shots.
"He's forgotten about you," I whispered gleefully as we sat upstairs watching the handball. "Should I go and remind him?" (I'd like to say the Man's response was unprintable but he doesn't really do unprintables - they're my strong point. But it was unambiguous.)
I've always been a highly proficient camera dodger. Photographers at large at functions and family gatherings are never drawn to me; I have a knack of retreating unobtrusively into the shadows. Maybe I subconsciously feel I've something to hide; maybe I believe cultures that believe a photograph violates or robs the soul of its subject are on to something. Maybe I'm just too private, and too proud. Maybe I don't think I'm interesting enough. Maybe all of these. I remember once taking part in a group activity where we made plaster casts of our faces. On inspection, it seemed to me that every other member of the group's cast was instantly recognisable by a salient feature, be it cheekbone structure or the bridge of a nose. Mine was almost expressionless in comparison: narrow, small and with 'flat' features.
It's strange the perceptions we form and how we see ourselves, and there's not always a great deal of rationality behind them.
The first impression I got from all of the shots he sent me was how vulnerable I look, coupled with a slightly begrudging admiration for Mark and his skill that allows him to penetrate the armour and draw out the essence of his subjects. I recognise myself in all of the photos but in one particularly, I can see my whole life. This is the one I love the most. I love all of them - I didn't expect to be delighted by any of them.
The shot Mark initially posted to the internet - the one he has since removed (thank you!) - provoked the most visceral reaction. Although it has since grown on me, I still think I look forbidding, unapproachable and not just a little scary. Think Philip II of Spain catching his first glimpse of the Virgin Queen in a miniature and evacuating his bowels in his hose*. This was the shot Mark chose to share, and I feel a bit bad about my veto. But it was just too much. This one remains under wraps.
I don't think the shot is particularly unflattering, but stark and unapologetically raw. It might have been taken during the 'throwing down the gauntlet to the camera' phase, which came after the 'appease the camera' and before the 'let's pretend I'm somewhere far away from here' and "freeze out the camera, oh God, can we go home now please?" phases. If this makes the sitting - standing? - sound like torture; it wasn't - I was curious enough to register how I felt: how I reacted to both the lens and the photographer and when, and what triggered the transitions… often my awareness of the surroundings as well as the photographer's directions.
In hindsight, one of his directions - to brush my hair out of my face - made me feel uncomfortable. I didn't say anything at the time, because it was a workshop, and not a commissioned sitting. It was about the photographer honing his skill, not me getting the most flattering pic in the world.
It was an enjoyable and instructive experience, and I came away with the revelation that, although I don't think I'll ever feel totally at ease being photographed, letting down your guard can be liberating, (never thought I'd say that!) and the realisation that portrait photography needn't be exclusively the domain of shiny happy extroverts (not that I'm saying I'm the exact opposite). And I won't deny that being likened by a Facebook commenter to 'Jeanne Moreau in her heyday' gave me that warm secret smile. Just a little, and because one of my first thoughts when I saw the shots was: "Ooh! That French actress; whatshername?" And then: It's only photography; let's not get above ourselves, now. It's the photographer; not me. And it is. The work of an intuitive and highly accomplished one.
The images are here. A set of images Mark took at the workshop is here. Mark's thoughts on the relationship between photographer and model are here.
*Nice image, but historically inaccurate: being her half-sister's widower, he already knew her.
Being relaxed in front of a camera is, like playing the upper register on the clarinet, a skill I've never mastered. I've always found it mildly inconveniencing but not really annoying. I looked at this as a challenge. I was inquisitive and nervous. Being shot in black and white also appealed to me. The instructions were straightforward too: a dark top and a coat with a fur collar if possible. (Had Mark said: "A pale blue top would be nice, and a sunny disposition. Oh, and please do wear something frilly and feminine and pink," I'd have been up sh*t creek.) There were also some additional instructions for the Man, who was pencilled in to appear out of focus as an extra. This didn't happen, much to the Man's relief.
The workshop took place outside, on a college campus. It was a couple of degrees below zero with a vicious windchill but luckily the gymnasium was open and heated and provided a welcome refuge between shots.
"He's forgotten about you," I whispered gleefully as we sat upstairs watching the handball. "Should I go and remind him?" (I'd like to say the Man's response was unprintable but he doesn't really do unprintables - they're my strong point. But it was unambiguous.)
I've always been a highly proficient camera dodger. Photographers at large at functions and family gatherings are never drawn to me; I have a knack of retreating unobtrusively into the shadows. Maybe I subconsciously feel I've something to hide; maybe I believe cultures that believe a photograph violates or robs the soul of its subject are on to something. Maybe I'm just too private, and too proud. Maybe I don't think I'm interesting enough. Maybe all of these. I remember once taking part in a group activity where we made plaster casts of our faces. On inspection, it seemed to me that every other member of the group's cast was instantly recognisable by a salient feature, be it cheekbone structure or the bridge of a nose. Mine was almost expressionless in comparison: narrow, small and with 'flat' features.
It's strange the perceptions we form and how we see ourselves, and there's not always a great deal of rationality behind them.
The first impression I got from all of the shots he sent me was how vulnerable I look, coupled with a slightly begrudging admiration for Mark and his skill that allows him to penetrate the armour and draw out the essence of his subjects. I recognise myself in all of the photos but in one particularly, I can see my whole life. This is the one I love the most. I love all of them - I didn't expect to be delighted by any of them.
The shot Mark initially posted to the internet - the one he has since removed (thank you!) - provoked the most visceral reaction. Although it has since grown on me, I still think I look forbidding, unapproachable and not just a little scary. Think Philip II of Spain catching his first glimpse of the Virgin Queen in a miniature and evacuating his bowels in his hose*. This was the shot Mark chose to share, and I feel a bit bad about my veto. But it was just too much. This one remains under wraps.
I don't think the shot is particularly unflattering, but stark and unapologetically raw. It might have been taken during the 'throwing down the gauntlet to the camera' phase, which came after the 'appease the camera' and before the 'let's pretend I'm somewhere far away from here' and "freeze out the camera, oh God, can we go home now please?" phases. If this makes the sitting - standing? - sound like torture; it wasn't - I was curious enough to register how I felt: how I reacted to both the lens and the photographer and when, and what triggered the transitions… often my awareness of the surroundings as well as the photographer's directions.
In hindsight, one of his directions - to brush my hair out of my face - made me feel uncomfortable. I didn't say anything at the time, because it was a workshop, and not a commissioned sitting. It was about the photographer honing his skill, not me getting the most flattering pic in the world.
It was an enjoyable and instructive experience, and I came away with the revelation that, although I don't think I'll ever feel totally at ease being photographed, letting down your guard can be liberating, (never thought I'd say that!) and the realisation that portrait photography needn't be exclusively the domain of shiny happy extroverts (not that I'm saying I'm the exact opposite). And I won't deny that being likened by a Facebook commenter to 'Jeanne Moreau in her heyday' gave me that warm secret smile. Just a little, and because one of my first thoughts when I saw the shots was: "Ooh! That French actress; whatshername?" And then: It's only photography; let's not get above ourselves, now. It's the photographer; not me. And it is. The work of an intuitive and highly accomplished one.
The images are here. A set of images Mark took at the workshop is here. Mark's thoughts on the relationship between photographer and model are here.
*Nice image, but historically inaccurate: being her half-sister's widower, he already knew her.
Imogene |
5 Comments | 



